Hull City CURSD Luck Score
2026-27 season · 2 matches played · View Premier League standings →
Hull City have had fortune smiling on them. The CLS says they're getting more than they deserve based on underlying performance. Not outrageous, but don't be surprised when the wheels start wobbling. Top driver: Shot Volume Gap (+20.3 CLS impact). Getting more points than their shot dominance warrants
Data last updated May 1, 2026, 7:00 PM UTC
Key Stats
CLS Evolution
How the CLS has changed throughout the season
One of those games where nothing went right. The model valued this match at 0.9 points for Hull City. They got 3. That's 2.1 points of bad luck in 90 minutes.
Individual Games
☠ Unluckiest Matches
✦ Luckiest Matches
Core Contributing Factors
What's Driving the CLS
Each factor's contribution to the CLS score. These add up to the total.
Future Outlook
Based on regression analysis - statistical tendencies, not guarantees.
See the oddsHull City are riding their luck at +24. They're winning games their underlying numbers don't fully support. The correction hasn't started yet, but historical patterns suggest it's coming.
Projected Finish
Projection blends 40% actual points-per-game with 60% expected points-per-game over the 36 games remaining. Heavier weight on xPTS because it strips out finishing variance, defensive luck, and the close-game randomness CURSD already tracks.
Fantasy Outlook
Most-Owned Attackers
| Player | Price | Owned | Goals | xG | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slater MID | £4.5 | 4.6% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Finishing in line with xG |
| McBurnie FWD | £5.5 | 2.1% | 0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Belloumi MID | £5.0 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Crooks MID | £4.5 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Dowell MID | £4.5 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Finishing in line with xG |
Δ = goals − xG. Positive = overperforming finishing (often unsustainable). Negative = underperforming (often a buy).