Sunderland

Sunderland CURSD Luck Score

2026-27 season · 5 matches played · View Premier League standings →

-18
CLS Score
1st unluckiest of 20 in the Premier League

Sunderland can't catch a break. 4 points when the data says they deserve closer to 5.71? 3 losses, many of them undeserved based on the chances created. The numbers say better days are coming. Top driver: Schedule Strength (-8.6 CLS impact). Faced stronger-than-average opponents - a tough draw

Data last updated May 1, 2026, 7:00 PM UTC

Key Stats

4
Points
Expected: 5.71
6
Goals Scored
xG: 2.68
10
Goals Conceded
xGA: 2.75
1.7
Points Below Expected
Unlucky gap

CLS Evolution

How the CLS has changed throughout the season

Unluckiest Match
Matchweek 4 · 2026-09-12 · vs Arsenal · at home
0-2
Lost at home against Arsenal

One of those games where nothing went right. Arsenal created almost nothing - just 0 xG - but scored 2 goals. The model valued this match at 1.0 points for Sunderland. They got 0. That's 1.0 points of bad luck in 90 minutes.

Match timeline
56'Enzo Le Fée scores for Sunderland
58'Bruno Guimaraes scores for Arsenal (assist: D. Rice)
90+6'Reinildo Mandava (Sunderland) - Red Card
90'B. Saka scores for Arsenal
0
xG Created
0
Opp. xG
-1.0
Pts Lost

Individual Games

☠ Unluckiest Matches

MW4 · 2026-09-12 · vs Arsenal · Home-1.0 pts
Lost 0-2 home despite 0.0 xG. Expected 1.0 pts, got 0.
Score: 0-2 | xG: 0-0
MW5 · 2026-09-20 · vs Manchester City · Away-1.0 pts
Lost 3-5 away despite 0.0 xG. Expected 1.0 pts, got 0. Read match report →
Score: 3-5 | xG: 0-0
MW1 · 2026-08-22 · vs Ipswich · Away-0.6 pts
Lost 1-2 away. xG: 0.7-1.8.
Score: 1-2 | xG: 0.66-1.8

✦ Luckiest Matches

MW2 · 2026-08-30 · vs Fulham · Home+0.9 pts
Won 1-0 home. xG: 2.0-0.9.
Score: 1-0 | xG: 2.02-0.95
MW3 · 2026-09-05 · vs Brentford · Away+-0.0 pts
Drew 1-1 away. xG: 0.0-0.0. Read match report →
Score: 1-1 | xG: 0-0
MW1 · 2026-08-22 · vs Ipswich · Away+-0.6 pts
Lost 1-2 away. xG: 0.7-1.8.
Score: 1-2 | xG: 0.66-1.8

Core Contributing Factors

What's Driving the CLS

Each factor's contribution to the CLS score. These add up to the total.

Schedule Strength
Faced stronger-than-average opponents - a tough draw
-8.6
xPTS Gap
2 fewer points than xG simulations say they deserve
-4.6
Defensive Luck
Conceded 7 more goals than the 2.8 xGA opponents generated
-3.4
Shot Volume Gap
Outshooting opponents but not getting the results to match
-1.8
Injury Burden
Low injury burden (23 player-games missed) - squad depth available
+1.8
Discipline
Receiving more cards than opponents - decisions going against them
-1
Finishing Luck
Scored 3 fewer goals than their 2.7 xG - wasting chances
-0.4
Total CLS-18

Rivalry Check

How are the rivals doing?

Future Outlook

Regression Outlook
Improvement Probable
Last 5: stable|33 games left

Based on regression analysis - statistical tendencies, not guarantees.

See the odds
Why?

At -18, Sunderland are meaningfully unlucky. They're roughly 2 points below where their performance says they deserve to be. The underlying quality is there - results are expected to follow as luck normalizes.

Next Matches
10-10
H
Brighton
Bet
10-18
A
Bournemouth
Bet
10-25
H
Leeds
Bet
10-31
A
Coventry
Bet
11-08
H
Chelsea
Bet

Projected Finish

Projected Position
14
of 20
No change from current 14
Projected Points
37
from 4 now (+33 remaining)
Pace
1.14
expected pts per game · 33 games left

Projection blends 40% actual points-per-game with 60% expected points-per-game over the 33 games remaining. Heavier weight on xPTS because it strips out finishing variance, defensive luck, and the close-game randomness CURSD already tracks.

Fantasy Outlook

FPL Watch

Most-Owned Attackers

Live FPL data · 6h cache
Sunderland's finishing has tracked their xG closely — fantasy returns are sustainable.
PlayerPriceOwnedGoalsxGΔVerdict
Brobbey FWD£5.76.7%32.9+0.1Finishing in line with xG
Xhaka MID£5.53.6%00.1-0.1Finishing in line with xG
E.Le Fée MID£5.73.3%12.1-1.1Underperforming xG — buy the dip
Isidor FWD£5.51.3%11.5-0.5Finishing in line with xG
J.Angulo FWD£4.50.7%00.00.0Finishing in line with xG

Δ = goals − xG. Positive = overperforming finishing (often unsustainable). Negative = underperforming (often a buy).