
Newcastle CURSD Luck Score
2025-26 season · 37 matches played · View Premier League standings →
Newcastle can't catch a break. 49 points when the data says they deserve closer to 54.94? 16 losses, many of them undeserved based on the chances created. The numbers say better days are coming. Top driver: xPTS Gap (-8.1 CLS impact). 6 fewer points than xG simulations say they deserve
Data last updated May 1, 2026, 7:00 PM UTC
Key Stats
CLS Evolution
How the CLS has changed throughout the season
A shutout loss that the numbers say should never have happened. Newcastle created 2.18 xG worth of chances - enough for roughly 2 goals on an average day. They scored 0. The model valued this match at 2.0 points for Newcastle. They got 0. That's 2.0 points of bad luck in 90 minutes.
Individual Games
☠ Unluckiest Matches
✦ Luckiest Matches
Core Contributing Factors
What's Driving the CLS
Each factor's contribution to the CLS score. These add up to the total.
Rivalry Check
How are the rivals doing?
Future Outlook
Based on regression analysis - statistical tendencies, not guarantees.
See the oddsAt -18, Newcastle are meaningfully unlucky. They're roughly 6 points below where their performance says they deserve to be. The underlying quality is there - results are expected to follow as luck normalizes.
Projected Finish
Projection blends 40% actual points-per-game with 60% expected points-per-game over the 1 games remaining. Heavier weight on xPTS because it strips out finishing variance, defensive luck, and the close-game randomness CURSD already tracks.
Fantasy Outlook
Most-Owned Attackers
| Player | Price | Owned | Goals | xG | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woltemade FWD | £6.7 | 6.4% | 8 | 6.6 | +1.4 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Bruno G. MID | £6.9 | 6.2% | 9 | 5.6 | +3.4 | Overperforming xG — sell candidate |
| Gordon MID | £7.2 | 3.2% | 6 | 8.8 | -2.8 | Underperforming xG — buy the dip |
| Elanga MID | £6.5 | 2.6% | 0 | 1.6 | -1.6 | Underperforming xG — buy the dip |
| L.Miley MID | £4.4 | 1.7% | 1 | 1.4 | -0.4 | Finishing in line with xG |
Δ = goals − xG. Positive = overperforming finishing (often unsustainable). Negative = underperforming (often a buy).

