Nottingham Forest CURSD Luck Score
2026-27 season · 5 matches played · View Premier League standings →
Nottingham Forest are getting roughly what they deserve. 5 points vs 6.2 expected - the football gods are neutral on this one.
Data last updated May 1, 2026, 7:00 PM UTC
Key Stats
CLS Evolution
How the CLS has changed throughout the season
One of those games where nothing went right. Leeds created almost nothing - just 0.47 xG - but scored 1 goal. The model valued this match at 1.5 points for Nottingham Forest. They got 0. That's 1.5 points of bad luck in 90 minutes.
Individual Games
☠ Unluckiest Matches
✦ Luckiest Matches
Core Contributing Factors
What's Driving the CLS
Each factor's contribution to the CLS score. These add up to the total.
Rivalry Check
How are the rivals doing?
Future Outlook
Based on regression analysis - statistical tendencies, not guarantees.
See the oddsNottingham Forest are right where they belong. Their CLS of +1 means results match performance. What you see is what you get. Their remaining schedule is moderate (opponents average 7th).
Projected Finish
Projection blends 40% actual points-per-game with 60% expected points-per-game over the 33 games remaining. Heavier weight on xPTS because it strips out finishing variance, defensive luck, and the close-game randomness CURSD already tracks.
Fantasy Outlook
Most-Owned Attackers
| Player | Price | Owned | Goals | xG | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibbs-White MID | £8.0 | 15.7% | 1 | 1.6 | -0.6 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Delap FWD | £5.6 | 2.7% | 1 | 0.9 | +0.1 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Igor Jesus FWD | £5.8 | 2.6% | 1 | 1.3 | -0.3 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Yates MID | £4.5 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Wood FWD | £5.8 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | Finishing in line with xG |
Δ = goals − xG. Positive = overperforming finishing (often unsustainable). Negative = underperforming (often a buy).