Blog/🏒 NHL

29 Shots to 9. Tampa Bay Still Lost. This Shouldn't Be Possible.

Montreal scored 2 goals on 9 shots. Tampa scored 1 on 29. The probability of this outcome: 4.65%.

Montreal had zero shots on goal in the second period. Not one. Tampa Bay fired 12.

The Lightning still lost 1-2.

The Numbers That Break the Model

At league-average shooting percentage (9.5%), a team taking 29 shots on goal is expected to score 2.75 goals. A team taking 9 shots is expected to score 0.85 goals. The expected scoreline was Tampa 3, Montreal 1. What actually happened was the inverse.

The probability of Tampa scoring 0 or 1 on 29 shots: 22.4%. The probability of Montreal scoring 2 or more on 9 shots: 20.8%. The probability of both happening in the same game: 4.65%.

One in twenty-one games. In a playoff elimination game.

Period by Period

PeriodTampa SOGMontreal SOGScore
1st940-1 MTL (Suzuki 18:39)
2nd1201-1 (James 13:27, PP)
3rd851-2 MTL (Newhook 11:07)
Total2991-2

Tampa dominated the second period so completely that Montreal didn't register a single shot on goal in 20 minutes. Tampa scored once. They emerged from that period tied 1-1.

Then Alex Newhook scored at 11:07 of the third. Montreal's fifth shot on goal in the final 40 minutes. And that was the series.

The Goaltending Gap

Tampa's goaltender saved 7 of 9 shots: 77.8% save percentage. Montreal's goaltender saved 28 of 29: 96.6%.

For context, the NHL playoff average save percentage is approximately .920. Montreal's goalie was 4.6 percentage points above average. Tampa's was 14.2 percentage points below. That 18.8-point combined swing is the game. Not the tactics, not the systems, not the matchups. The goalies.

Shot Attempts: Even More Lopsided

Shots on goal (29-9) tell part of the story. Total shot attempts tell more: Tampa generated 55 attempts to Montreal's 40. A Corsi of 57.9% for Tampa. They weren't just shooting more, they were controlling play at 5-on-5 by every available metric.

How Rare Is This?

A team outshooting their opponent 3:1 or more and losing in regulation happens in roughly 2-3% of all NHL games. In the playoffs, with a series on the line, with a 29-9 differential including a period with zero opponent shots? This is among the most statistically improbable playoff losses in modern NHL history.

The 9 shots on goal for a winning team in a playoff game is believed to be one of the lowest totals ever recorded. For perspective, the average NHL team generates approximately 30-32 shots per game. Montreal generated less than a third of that and won.

NHL Record: Fewest Shots on Goal in a Playoff Win

Montreal didn't just win with few shots. They set the all-time NHL playoff record.

RankShotsTeamScoreOpponentDateRoundBox Score
19Montréal Canadiens2-1 WTampa Bay LightningMay 3, 2026R1 Game 7NHL.com
210Edmonton Oilers2-1 WDallas StarsJun 2, 2024WCF Game 6NHL.com
210New Jersey Devils2-1 WWashington CapitalsApr 9, 1990DSF Game 3Hockey-Ref
210Chicago Blackhawks1-0 WLos Angeles KingsApr 13, 1974QF Game 3Hockey-Ref
511Philadelphia Flyers2-0 WWashington CapitalsApr 22, 2016R1 Game 5NHL.com
511Washington Capitals2-0 WOttawa SenatorsMay 13, 1998R2 Game 3Hockey-Ref

Source: NHL records, Yahoo Sports, hockey-reference.com. Pre-1960 games excluded (shots not reliably tracked).

Every team on this list won by exactly 1 or 2 goals. Every game was a low-event, goaltending-dominated affair. But none of them featured a period with zero shots on goal by the winning team. Montreal's second period, with not a single shot on Andrei Vasilevskiy, is believed to be the first scoreless period in playoff history where the winning team had zero shots.

The Season-Long Pattern

This game didn't happen in isolation. Tampa Bay carried a CURSD Luck Score of -21 into the playoffs, the product of a 50-26-6 regular season where they consistently lost one-goal games they deserved to win. Their close-game record was 15-16 (48.4%). Montreal's was 23-16 (58.9%).

The regular season data predicted this. Not this specific game, not this specific scoreline. But the pattern: Tampa controls play, generates chances, and loses anyway. The CLS measured it all year. The playoffs confirmed it.

Twenty-nine shots. Zero shots against in an entire period. One goal.

The data says what the scoreline hides.

Free

Liked this? Get more.

Weekly analysis like this one, in your inbox every Monday. 5 picks the CURSD way: cursed teams ripe for regression, blessed teams due to cool off.

No spam. One email per week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Share

Read next