
Manchester City CURSD Luck Score
2025-26 season · 37 matches played · View Premier League standings →
Manchester City have been living on borrowed time. 78 points from 67.67 expected? They're riding a wave of fortune that the data says won't last. Enjoy it while it lasts - regression is coming, and she doesn't knock. Top driver: xPTS Gap (+16.2 CLS impact). 10 more points than xG simulations predict they deserve
Data last updated May 1, 2026, 7:00 PM UTC
Key Stats
CLS Evolution
How the CLS has changed throughout the season
A shutout loss that the numbers say should never have happened. Manchester City generated 1.55 xG, comfortably more than the 1.11 their opponent managed. The model valued this match at 1.7 points for Manchester City. They got 0. That's 1.7 points of bad luck in 90 minutes.
Individual Games
☠ Unluckiest Matches
✦ Luckiest Matches
Core Contributing Factors
What's Driving the CLS
Each factor's contribution to the CLS score. These add up to the total.
Rivalry Check
How are the rivals doing?
Future Outlook
Based on regression analysis - statistical tendencies, not guarantees.
See the oddsAt +58, Manchester City are living on borrowed time. This level of overperformance is historically unsustainable. The gap between their results and their actual quality is too large to maintain.
Projected Finish
Projection blends 40% actual points-per-game with 60% expected points-per-game over the 1 games remaining. Heavier weight on xPTS because it strips out finishing variance, defensive luck, and the close-game randomness CURSD already tracks.
Fantasy Outlook
Most-Owned Attackers
| Player | Price | Owned | Goals | xG | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haaland FWD | £14.7 | 64.3% | 27 | 25.5 | +1.5 | Overperforming xG — sell candidate |
| Semenyo MID | £8.1 | 46.9% | 16 | 11.0 | +5.0 | Overperforming xG — sell candidate |
| Cherki MID | £6.6 | 19.0% | 4 | 4.3 | -0.3 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Reijnders MID | £5.0 | 8.9% | 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 | Finishing in line with xG |
| Foden MID | £8.0 | 7.6% | 7 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Finishing in line with xG |
Δ = goals − xG. Positive = overperforming finishing (often unsustainable). Negative = underperforming (often a buy).


